---
title: The Electromagnetic Field Tensor
module: Covariant Electromagnetism
moduleNumber: 4
lessonNumber: 2
order: 402
summary: >
  The antisymmetric derivative of the four-potential is the field-strength tensor
  F, gauge invariant by construction, with the electric and magnetic fields as
  its components. Its dual exchanges E and B, and its two contractions form the
  Lorentz invariants that classify a field as electric, magnetic, or radiative in
  every frame.
topics: [Covariant Electromagnetism]
draft: false
sources:
  - book: Schutz
    ref: "Ch. 4 — the electromagnetic field tensor and its components"
  - book: Carroll
    ref: "Lecture Notes on General Relativity §1 — Special Relativity and Flat Spacetime (electromagnetism, field strength), arXiv:gr-qc/9712019"
---

The [four-potential](/relativity/covariant-electrodynamics/four-current-and-the-four-potential)
carries a gauge redundancy, so it is not itself observable. The observable
fields come from a particular antisymmetric combination of its derivatives, one
that is invariant under $A^\mu \to A^\mu + \partial^\mu \chi$. That combination
is a rank-two tensor, and packing the six numbers of $\vec E$ and $\vec B$ into
its components is the step that makes electromagnetism manifestly Lorentz
covariant.[^carroll2]

The conventions of the previous lesson carry over: signature $(-,+,+,+)$,
$\partial_\mu = (\tfrac{1}{c}\partial_t, \nabla)$, and $A^\mu = (\phi/c, \vec A)$.

## Building the field strength

The gauge shift $A^\mu \to A^\mu + \partial^\mu \chi$ adds $\partial^\mu
\partial^\nu \chi$ to $\partial^\mu A^\nu$. Because partial derivatives commute,
$\partial^\mu \partial^\nu \chi = \partial^\nu \partial^\mu \chi$, the
antisymmetric part is unchanged. Define the **electromagnetic field tensor**, or
field strength, as

$$
F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial^\nu A^\mu.
$$

Under a gauge transformation,

$$
F^{\mu\nu} \to \partial^\mu(A^\nu + \partial^\nu \chi) - \partial^\nu(A^\mu +
\partial^\mu \chi) = F^{\mu\nu} + (\partial^\mu \partial^\nu - \partial^\nu
\partial^\mu)\chi = F^{\mu\nu}.
$$

The field strength is gauge invariant, which is the property that qualifies it
to hold physical fields. It is antisymmetric, $F^{\mu\nu} = -F^{\nu\mu}$, so its
diagonal vanishes and it has six independent components — exactly the count of
$\vec E$ and $\vec B$ together.

> **Definition (Field-strength tensor).** $F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^\mu A^\nu -
> \partial^\nu A^\mu$. It is antisymmetric and gauge invariant, with six
> independent components. Its lower-index form is $F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu
> A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu$, obtained by lowering both indices with $\eta$.

## Reading off E and B

Evaluate the components. For the time–space entries, with $A^0 = \phi/c$ and
$\partial^0 = -\tfrac{1}{c}\partial_t$,

$$
F^{0i} = \partial^0 A^i - \partial^i A^0 = -\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial
A_i}{\partial t} - \partial_i\!\left(\frac{\phi}{c}\right) = \frac{1}{c}\left(-
\frac{\partial A_i}{\partial t} - \partial_i \phi\right) = \frac{E_i}{c}.
$$

The time–space block of $F^{\mu\nu}$ is the electric field, scaled by $1/c$. For
the space–space entries, with spatial indices raised trivially,

$$
F^{ij} = \partial^i A^j - \partial^j A^i = \partial_i A_j - \partial_j A_i =
\epsilon^{ijk} B_k,
$$

using $\vec B = \nabla \times \vec A$. The space–space block is the magnetic
field, arranged antisymmetrically. Assembled, the tensor is

$$
F^{\mu\nu} = \begin{pmatrix}
0 & E_x/c & E_y/c & E_z/c \\
-E_x/c & 0 & B_z & -B_y \\
-E_y/c & -B_z & 0 & B_x \\
-E_z/c & B_y & -B_x & 0
\end{pmatrix}.
$$

The electric field occupies the first row and column; the magnetic field fills
the spatial $3 \times 3$ block. The single object $F^{\mu\nu}$ holds both fields;
"electric" and "magnetic" are the names of its time–space and space–space parts
in one chosen frame.

$$
% caption: The antisymmetric field-strength tensor with the electric field in
% its time–space border (scaled by one over c) and the magnetic field in the
% spatial block; the vanishing diagonal and the sign flip across it encode the
% antisymmetry.
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth, font=\footnotesize, scale=1.0]
  \definecolor{acc}{HTML}{4A6FA5}
  \draw[black] (0,0) rectangle (4.8,4.8);
  % grid
  \foreach \i in {1,2,3} \draw[black] (1.2*\i,0) -- (1.2*\i,4.8);
  \foreach \i in {1,2,3} \draw[black] (0,1.2*\i) -- (4.8,1.2*\i);
  % shade time-space border (E) : first row and first column
  \fill[acc!12] (1.2,3.6) rectangle (4.8,4.8);
  \fill[acc!12] (0,0) rectangle (1.2,3.6);
  % diagonal zeros
  \foreach \i in {0,1,2,3} \node[black] at (0.6+1.2*\i,4.2-1.2*\i) {0};
  % E labels top row
  \node[black!70] at (1.8,4.2) {Ex/c};
  \node[black!70] at (3.0,4.2) {Ey/c};
  \node[black!70] at (4.2,4.2) {Ez/c};
  % B labels in spatial block
  \node[black!70] at (3.0,3.0) {Bz};
  \node[black!70] at (4.2,3.0) {By};
  \node[black!70] at (4.2,1.8) {Bx};
  % axis labels
  \node[black, anchor=south] at (0.6,4.9) {t};
  \node[black, anchor=south] at (1.8,4.9) {x};
  \node[black, anchor=south] at (3.0,4.9) {y};
  \node[black, anchor=south] at (4.2,4.9) {z};
  \node[acc, anchor=west] at (5.1,4.2) {E in the border};
  \node[black, anchor=west] at (5.1,2.4) {B in the block};
\end{tikzpicture}
$$

Lowering both indices flips the sign of the time–space entries only, since each
factor of $\eta_{00} = -1$ appears once there and twice (or zero times) elsewhere:

$$
F_{\mu\nu} = \begin{pmatrix}
0 & -E_x/c & -E_y/c & -E_z/c \\
E_x/c & 0 & B_z & -B_y \\
E_y/c & -B_z & 0 & B_x \\
E_z/c & B_y & -B_x & 0
\end{pmatrix}.
$$

## Fields mix under a boost

Because $\vec E$ and $\vec B$ are components of a single tensor, a change of
frame mixes them. Under a Lorentz transformation the field strength transforms as
a rank-two tensor,

$$
F'^{\mu\nu} = \Lambda^\mu{}_\alpha \Lambda^\nu{}_\beta F^{\alpha\beta}.
$$

A boost $\Lambda$ rotates the time axis into a space axis, so it rotates entries
of the electric block into the magnetic block and back. A field that is purely
electric in one frame acquires a magnetic part in another. The next lesson works
out the transformation explicitly; the point here is structural. There is no
frame-independent split of the field into "electric" and "magnetic" pieces, any
more than there is a frame-independent split of a four-vector into time and
space. There is only $F^{\mu\nu}$, and observers slice it differently.

$$
% caption: A boost rotates the time direction into a spatial direction, so it
% carries entries of the electric time–space border into the magnetic spatial
% block: a purely electric field in one frame has a magnetic part in another.
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth, font=\footnotesize, scale=1.0]
  \definecolor{acc}{HTML}{4A6FA5}
  % left tensor: pure E
  \draw[black] (0,0) rectangle (2.4,2.4);
  \fill[black!8] (0.6,1.2) rectangle (2.4,1.8);
  \fill[black!8] (0,0) rectangle (0.6,1.8);
  \node at (1.2,2.1) {E};
  \node[black] at (1.5,0.9) {0};
  \node[black!70, anchor=north] at (1.2,-0.15) {one frame};
  % arrow
  \draw[->, very thick] (2.9,1.2) -- (4.5,1.2) node[above, midway, black!70] {boost};
  % right tensor: E and B
  \draw[black] (5.0,0) rectangle (7.4,2.4);
  \fill[black!8] (5.6,1.2) rectangle (7.4,1.8);
  \fill[black!8] (5.0,0) rectangle (5.6,1.8);
  \fill[acc!14] (5.6,0) rectangle (7.4,1.2);
  \node at (6.2,2.1) {E};
  \node[acc] at (6.5,0.6) {B};
  \node[black!70, anchor=north] at (6.2,-0.15) {other frame};
\end{tikzpicture}
$$

## The dual tensor

A second antisymmetric tensor is built from $F$ using the totally antisymmetric
Levi-Civita symbol $\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}$ (with $\epsilon^{0123} = +1$).
The **dual field tensor** is

$$
\tilde F^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} F_{\alpha\beta}.
$$

Contracting with $\epsilon$ exchanges the roles of the two blocks. The dual is
obtained from $F$ by the substitution

$$
\frac{\vec E}{c} \to \vec B, \qquad \vec B \to -\frac{\vec E}{c},
$$

so that its components are

$$
\tilde F^{\mu\nu} = \begin{pmatrix}
0 & B_x & B_y & B_z \\
-B_x & 0 & -E_z/c & E_y/c \\
-B_y & E_z/c & 0 & -E_x/c \\
-B_z & -E_y/c & E_x/c & 0
\end{pmatrix}.
$$

The dual is the tool for writing the two source-free Maxwell equations compactly,
as the [covariant Maxwell
lesson](/relativity/covariant-electrodynamics/covariant-maxwell-and-the-stress-energy-tensor)
shows: $\partial_\mu \tilde F^{\mu\nu} = 0$ is Faraday's law and $\nabla \cdot
\vec B = 0$ together. The exchange $\vec E \leftrightarrow c\vec B$ (with a sign)
is the electric–magnetic duality of the source-free equations.

$$
% caption: The dual tensor is F with its blocks swapped, sending E over c to B
% and B to minus E over c; this exchange is the electric–magnetic duality of the
% source-free Maxwell equations.
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth, font=\footnotesize, scale=1.0]
  \definecolor{acc}{HTML}{4A6FA5}
  % F
  \draw[black] (0,0) rectangle (2.4,2.4);
  \fill[acc!14] (0,1.2) rectangle (2.4,2.4);
  \fill[black] (0,0) rectangle (2.4,1.2);
  \node[acc] at (1.2,1.8) {E block};
  \node[black!70] at (1.2,0.6) {B block};
  \node[black!70, anchor=north] at (1.2,-0.2) {F};
  % arrows swapping
  \draw[->, black, thick] (2.7,1.7) to[out=20,in=160] (4.9,1.7);
  \draw[->, black, thick] (4.9,0.7) to[out=200,in=340] (2.7,0.7);
  \node[black!70, anchor=south] at (3.8,1.85) {swap};
  % dual
  \draw[black] (5.2,0) rectangle (7.6,2.4);
  \fill[black] (5.2,1.2) rectangle (7.6,2.4);
  \fill[acc!14] (5.2,0) rectangle (7.6,1.2);
  \node[black!70] at (6.4,1.8) {B block};
  \node[acc] at (6.4,0.6) {E block};
  \node[black!70, anchor=north] at (6.4,-0.2) {dual F};
\end{tikzpicture}
$$

## The two invariants

From the six components of the field two Lorentz scalars can be built, and only
two independent ones. They are the full contractions of $F$ with itself and with
its dual. The first is

$$
F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} = 2\left(B^2 - \frac{E^2}{c^2}\right).
$$

The time–space entries contribute $-2E^2/c^2$ (each carries a sign from lowering
one time index) and the space–space entries contribute $+2B^2$. The second
invariant comes from the dual:

$$
F_{\mu\nu} \tilde F^{\mu\nu} = -\frac{4}{c}\,\vec E \cdot \vec B.
$$

These two combinations,

$$
E^2 - c^2 B^2 \quad\text{and}\quad \vec E \cdot \vec B,
$$

have the same value in every inertial frame. They classify the field.

- **$\vec E \cdot \vec B$ is invariant.** If $\vec E$ and $\vec B$ are
  perpendicular in one frame (as in a light wave), they are perpendicular in
  every frame.
- **$E^2 - c^2 B^2$ is invariant.** Its sign labels the field as electrically
  dominated ($E > cB$), magnetically dominated ($E < cB$), or balanced ($E =
  cB$), the same label in all frames.

Several statements follow at once. If a field is purely electric in some frame,
then $\vec E \cdot \vec B = 0$ and $E^2 - c^2 B^2 > 0$ there, hence in every
frame — so no boost can transform it into a purely magnetic field, though it can
give it a magnetic part. If both invariants vanish, $\vec E \perp \vec B$ and $E
= cB$ in every frame; this is the invariant signature of a radiation field, a
light wave, which no observer can boost away.

$$
% caption: The invariant E-squared minus c-squared B-squared classifies a field
% in a frame-independent way: its sign is the same for every observer, so a field
% dominated by one part cannot be boosted into a field dominated by the other.
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth, font=\footnotesize, scale=1.0]
  \definecolor{acc}{HTML}{4A6FA5}
  % number line for the invariant
  \draw[->, black] (-4.2,0) -- (4.6,0) node[right, black!70] {invariant};
  \draw[acc] (0,-0.12) -- (0,0.12);
  \node[acc, anchor=north] at (0,-0.22) {balanced};
  \node[acc, anchor=north] at (0,-0.7) {$E = cB$ (radiation)};
  % electric side
  \fill[black!8] (0.1,0.15) rectangle (4.1,0.6);
  \node[anchor=south] at (2.1,0.62) {electric dominated};
  \node[black, anchor=north] at (2.1,-0.15) {no boost removes E};
  % magnetic side
  \fill[black!8] (-4.1,0.15) rectangle (-0.1,0.6);
  \node[black!70, anchor=south] at (-2.1,0.62) {magnetic dominated};
  \node[black, anchor=north] at (-2.1,-0.15) {no boost removes B};
\end{tikzpicture}
$$

> **Worked example (Boosting away a field).** A field has $\vec E \cdot \vec B =
> 0$ and $E < cB$ in the lab, so it is magnetically dominated. Ask whether some
> frame sees a pure magnetic field. In that frame $E' = 0$, giving $\vec E' \cdot
> \vec B' = 0$ (consistent) and $E'^2 - c^2 B'^2 = -c^2 B'^2 < 0$ (also
> consistent, since $E^2 - c^2 B^2 < 0$ in the lab). Both invariants permit it,
> and such a frame exists: boost with velocity $\vec v = (\vec E \times \vec
> B)/B^2$, whose speed $v = E/(cB) \cdot c = E/B < c$ precisely because the field
> is magnetically dominated. Had the field been electrically dominated, this
> velocity would exceed $c$ and no such frame would exist.

## Summary

- The field-strength tensor $F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial^\nu
  A^\mu$ is antisymmetric and gauge invariant. Its six independent components are
  $\vec E$ (time–space block, scaled by $1/c$) and $\vec B$ (space–space block).
- A boost transforms $F$ as a tensor and mixes its blocks; the split into
  electric and magnetic fields is frame dependent, while $F^{\mu\nu}$ is not.
- The dual tensor $\tilde F^{\mu\nu} = \tfrac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}
  F_{\alpha\beta}$ exchanges $\vec E/c \leftrightarrow \vec B$ (with a sign) and
  packages the source-free equations.
- The two invariants $E^2 - c^2 B^2$ and $\vec E \cdot \vec B$ take the same
  value in every frame and classify the field; both vanish for a radiation field.

[^carroll2]: Carroll, _Lecture Notes on General Relativity_, §1 (electromagnetism
and the field strength), arXiv:gr-qc/9712019; Schutz, _A First Course in General
Relativity_, Ch. 4. The component arrangement and the two invariants follow these
treatments in the $(-,+,+,+)$ signature.
