Cosets, Lagrange, and Normal Subgroups
The left cosets of a subgroup partition a group into equal-sized blocks, so the order of a subgroup divides the order of the group: Lagrange's theorem. When the blocks can be multiplied consistently — exactly when the subgroup is normal — they form the quotient group .
╌╌╌╌
Subgroups do more than sit inside a group; each one slices the group into translates of itself. Those translates, the cosets, are all the same size, and that single fact is the most-used counting theorem in finite group theory. When the cosets can be multiplied among themselves, they form a new, smaller group, the quotient.
Cosets and the partition of a group
Left cosets carve into disjoint blocks that cover it.
Every lies in its own coset (since ), so the cosets cover . If two cosets share an element , then for any one writes , and symmetrically, so the two cosets coincide. Distinct cosets are therefore disjoint.1 The equivalence is the practical membership test.
Each coset has exactly elements, because is a bijection from onto (left cancellation makes it injective). Equal-size blocks partitioning is all Lagrange's theorem needs.
Everything above holds verbatim for right cosets, which partition as well.
The two partitions differ in general — for a non-normal subgroup some left
coset is not a right coset for any representative — but they always have the
same number of blocks: maps each left coset onto the
right coset , a bijection between the two collections. So index
is
unambiguous. These notes work with left cosets throughout.2
Lagrange's theorem
If there are cosets, each of size , and they partition , then , so and .3 The number is named.
Three consequences are immediate and constant tools.
- Order divides. For , divides , so for every .
- Prime order forces cyclic. If is prime, any nonidentity generates a subgroup of order dividing and larger than , so .
- A product-size formula. For finite subgroups , , where need not be a subgroup.
The partition is concrete for and the order- subgroup . The three left cosets each hold two of the six elements.
The converse of Lagrange is false: a divisor of need not be the order of a subgroup. The alternating group has order but no subgroup of order : such a subgroup would have index , forcing for every , but has eight elements of order and each is the square of its own square, more than a subgroup of order can hold.4 Two partial converses hold and are proved later: Cauchy's theorem, that a prime forces an element (hence a subgroup) of order , and Sylow's theorem, giving subgroups of every prime-power order dividing .
Products of subgroups
The set collects all products across two subgroups. Counting its elements is a coset argument: is a union of cosets , and exactly when , so the number of distinct cosets is and
The formula holds whether or not is a subgroup, and often proves it is not: in with and , , which does not divide , so is not a subgroup (and, as a byproduct, ). The clean criterion: is a subgroup if and only if , which holds in particular whenever — so a product with a normal subgroup is always a subgroup.5
Normal subgroups and well-defined coset multiplication
The goal is to multiply cosets: define . This depends on choosing representatives, and in general the choice matters. The operation is consistent exactly for a distinguished class of subgroups.
If the rule is well defined, comparing the products of the reps of and of forces . Conversely, that condition lets one push a representative change from one factor through the other and land in the same coset.6 The condition names the subgroup.
Several conditions on are the same statement, tying normality back to the normalizer.
For the non-normal in , the cosets and
have no consistent product: the representatives and of
give and , which lie in
different cosets. So the quotient
of by is not a group.7
Normal subgroups are precisely the kernels of homomorphisms.
A kernel is normal because ; conversely, the projection realizes any normal as a kernel.8 Two shortcuts make normality cheap to check: it suffices to test conjugates of a generating set of by a generating set of , and any subgroup of index 2 is automatically normal, since the two left cosets ( and its complement) must coincide with the two right cosets.
The quotient group
The quotient collapses to a point and translates that collapse across all of . A small case: in take . Its three cosets , , multiply (here, add) as representatives, and the quotient is a group of order .
A structural example: with . Each coset has two elements, so there are four cosets. Every nonidentity coset squares to the identity coset, so the quotient has no element of order and is the Klein four-group: .9
Application: Fermat and Euler
Lagrange, read inside the group of units , gives two number-theoretic theorems at once. The order of that group is , so for every unit.
This is applied to and .10 Specializing to a prime , where , gives the classical case.
No number theory beyond the definition of enters: both are the statement that an element's order divides the group's order.
A -digit number is resolved by one group order and a handful of squarings: the repeated-squares ladder, with Euler shrinking the exponent before the ladder even starts.
Footnotes
- Dummit & Foote, Abstract Algebra, §3.1, Proposition 4 — left cosets partition , with . ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.2 and Exercise 12 — right cosets satisfy the same combinatorics, and gives a bijection between left and right cosets. ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.2, Theorem 8 (Lagrange) — divides and , with Corollaries 9 and 10. ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.2 — the failure of the converse of Lagrange for , and the statements of Cauchy's and Sylow's theorems as partial converses. ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.2, Propositions 13–14 and Corollary 15 — , a subgroup iff , and the normalizer sufficient condition. ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.1, Proposition 5 — coset multiplication by representatives is well defined if and only if for all . ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.2, Example 1 — the cosets of in have no well-defined product. ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.1, Proposition 7 and Theorem 6 — the equivalence of the characterizations of normality and the identification of normal subgroups with kernels via the natural projection. ↩
- Dummit & Foote, §3.1, Example — . ↩
- Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §6.3 — Euler's Theorem and Fermat's Little Theorem as Lagrange's theorem in . ↩
╌╌ END ╌╌