Early Atomic Models and the Old Quantum Theory/The Bohr-Sommerfeld Old Quantum Theory

Lesson 1.41,638 words

The Bohr-Sommerfeld Old Quantum Theory

Bohr fixed the hydrogen levels with a single quantum number by quantizing angular momentum. Sommerfeld replaced that ad hoc rule with a general prescription: quantize the action of each separable coordinate.

╌╌╌╌

Bohr's condition quantizes one degree of freedom, the angle swept by a circular orbit. A general bound motion has more degrees of freedom, and a Coulomb orbit is generically an ellipse, not a circle. In 1916 Sommerfeld supplied the missing generalization: quantize the action of every separable coordinate independently. The prescription reproduces the Bohr energies, introduces a second quantum number that labels the shape of the orbit, quantizes the orientation of the orbital plane in space, and — with the relativistic correction to the electron mass — splits each Bohr level into a fine-structure multiplet. This is the high-water mark of the old quantum theory, the last atomic model built from classical orbits before wave mechanics replaced them.

The action-integral quantization rule

For a periodic coordinate with conjugate momentum , the action variable is the phase-space area enclosed over one period,

Sommerfeld and Wilson postulated that each such action is an integer multiple of Planck's constant.1

The rule is dimensionally forced: has units of action, the same as , and no other combination of the orbital constants is dimensionless when divided by . Its deeper justification is Ehrenfest's adiabatic principle, taken up at the end of this lesson: the action integrals coincide with the mechanical quantities that stay constant when the system is deformed slowly, so they are the only quantities that can carry an unchanging integer label.

The phase-space trajectory of a one-dimensional bound motion is a closed loop; the enclosed area equals the action J, and quantization admits only the loops whose area is an integer multiple of h.

The circular orbit recovered

For the hydrogen atom, use plane polar coordinates in the orbital plane. The Lagrangian , with the Coulomb strength , gives the conjugate momenta

Because is cyclic, is a constant of the motion — it is the orbital angular momentum . Its action integral over one revolution is immediate:

Quantizing with the azimuthal integer gives , that is . For a circular orbit , so the radial action vanishes and alone labels the state. Identifying with Bohr's reproduces and every result of the Bohr model. The content of Sommerfeld's extension is what happens when does not vanish.

Elliptical orbits and the radial quantum number

An orbit with is an ellipse with the nucleus at one focus. The radial momentum follows from energy conservation. Writing the energy with the centrifugal term,

The motion oscillates between the perihelion and aphelion , the two roots of the radicand, where . The radial action is the integral over one in-and-out excursion,2

This is a standard integral of the form with , , and . For a bound orbit () its value is

Quantizing and inserting gives

Define the principal quantum number . Squaring isolates the energy,

The energy is exactly Bohr's, but the state is now labelled by two integers. The radial quantum number counts the radial oscillations, and the azimuthal quantum number fixes the angular momentum . The value is excluded: it describes a degenerate straight line through the nucleus, a collision orbit with no angular momentum, which the old theory rejects. For each there are allowed values of , all degenerate in energy.

The shape of the orbit

The eccentricity of the ellipse is set by the ratio . The angular momentum of a Kepler ellipse of semi-major axis and eccentricity is , while fixes the semi-major axis from the energy alone. Both the circular orbit () and the ellipse of the same share this , so

where is the semi-minor axis and is the angular momentum of the circle of the same energy. The orbit is roundest when and most elongated when ; the perihelion of the ellipse dips close to the nucleus, which is exactly where the relativistic correction below will bite hardest.

The three Sommerfeld orbits with n = 3 share the same semi-major axis and energy but differ in azimuthal quantum number k; the ratio b/a equals k/n, so k = 3 is the Bohr circle and k = 1 is the most eccentric ellipse, all with the nucleus at a common focus.

Space quantization

In three dimensions the orbital plane can tilt, adding a third degree of freedom. Working in spherical coordinates with the polar axis fixed by an external field, the azimuthal angle about that axis is cyclic, and its conjugate momentum is the projection of the angular momentum on the axis. Its action integral gives a third condition,3

with the magnetic quantum number an integer. The polar action then constrains the total angular momentum magnitude to as before, with the requirement . The orbital plane cannot point in an arbitrary direction: only the orientations with integer are allowed. This space quantization is the old-theory ancestor of the directional quantization confirmed by the Stern-Gerlach experiment, treated with electron spin.

Counting the states of a given reproduces a result the full quantum theory recovers exactly. For each azimuthal number there are allowed orientations (the values ), and runs from to , so the total is

Identifying the Sommerfeld azimuthal number with the modern orbital number through turns this into the familiar hydrogenic count: runs from to , each with values of , again summing to . The old theory already carries the degeneracy structure of the quantum hydrogen atom, though it assigns the states to orbits rather than to wavefunctions.

Space quantization for k = 2: the angular-momentum vector of fixed length k hbar may take only the orientations whose projection on the field axis is an integer multiple of hbar, giving the five allowed values m = 2, 1, 0, -1, -2 marked on the vertical axis.

The relativistic fine-structure correction

The Bohr-Sommerfeld levels are exactly degenerate in : every ellipse of a given has the same energy. Experiment shows a small splitting. Sommerfeld found its origin by keeping the relativistic dependence of the electron mass on speed. The elliptical orbit runs fastest at perihelion, where the mass is largest, so the orbit no longer closes: the perihelion precesses and the ellipse traces a slowly rotating rosette.4

With the relativistic mass variation the elliptical orbit fails to close; the perihelion advances a little each revolution and the path fills a rosette between an inner and an outer radius, lifting the k-degeneracy of the Bohr level.

Evaluating the action integrals with the relativistic momentum, Sommerfeld obtained a closed form for the energy that keeps to all orders, where is the fine-structure constant:

Expanding in powers of and writing gives the form used to compare with spectra,

The leading bracketed term is the Bohr energy; the correction is smaller by a factor for hydrogen. It depends on , so it lifts the degeneracy: within a level , the small- (eccentric) orbits are shifted down more than the large- (round) ones, because the eccentric orbit spends part of its period deep in the potential where the electron moves relativistically.

The relativistic correction splits a single Bohr level of principal quantum number n = 3 into three sublevels labelled by k; the most eccentric orbit (k = 1) is bound most tightly, and the spacing scales as alpha squared times the gross energy.

The numerical agreement was a triumph. The success is partly a coincidence: the Sommerfeld formula agrees with the exact Dirac result once the azimuthal number is reinterpreted as , with the total angular momentum. Sommerfeld got the right levels from the wrong physics: the splitting is dominated by electron spin, absent from his purely orbital calculation, and two errors compensate to give the correct answer.

Adiabatic invariance

The action integrals were quantized without justification beyond dimensional consistency. Ehrenfest supplied the principle that singles them out. A quantity is an adiabatic invariant if it is unchanged when the parameters of the Hamiltonian are varied slowly compared with the orbital period. For a one-dimensional periodic system the action is such an invariant to all orders in the rate of change.5

The relevance is this. A quantum number must be a discrete label that cannot change under a smooth, slow deformation of the system, since a slow deformation excites no transition. Only an adiabatic invariant qualifies. The action integrals are the adiabatic invariants of a separable bound motion, so they are the correct quantities to set equal to . For the harmonic oscillator, slowly changing leaves fixed, the classical shadow of the quantum statement that the integer does not change when a trap is squeezed gently. This principle carries into the wave theory as the invariance of the quantum number under adiabatic changes of a Hamiltonian.

The Bohr-Sommerfeld theory is the furthest the orbit picture reaches. It handles one-electron atoms, fixes the level count, and produces a fine structure of the right magnitude, but it fails the moment a second electron makes the motion non-separable, and it cannot supply the half-integers that a correct theory requires. Those limits, and the semiclassical rule that survives them, are the subject of the next lesson.

Footnotes

  1. Bransden & Joachain, Physics of Atoms and Molecules, 2nd ed., §2.5 — the Wilson-Sommerfeld action-quantization rule and its application to periodic systems. https://www.pearson.com/en-gb/subject-catalog/p/physics-of-atoms-and-molecules/P200000005386
  2. Bransden & Joachain, §2.5 — the radial and azimuthal action integrals for the Coulomb problem and the emergence of ; the closed form of the radial integral is worked in the appendix. See also Demtröder, Atoms, Molecules and Photons, 2nd ed., §3.4. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-10298-1
  3. Bransden & Joachain, §2.5 — space quantization and the magnetic quantum number from the third action integral; Foot, Atomic Physics, Ch. 1. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atomic-physics-9780198506959
  4. Bransden & Joachain, §2.6 — Sommerfeld's relativistic treatment, the precessing orbit, and the fine-structure formula; the reinterpretation matching the Dirac spectrum. The fine-structure constant value is the CODATA recommended value. https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
  5. Bransden & Joachain, §2.5 — Ehrenfest's adiabatic principle and the role of adiabatic invariants in selecting the quantized action variables.

╌╌ END ╌╌