Fine Structure and the Dirac Atom/The Dirac Equation for Hydrogen

Lesson 3.41,161 words

The Dirac Equation for Hydrogen

The fine-structure formula was assembled from three perturbations; the Dirac equation produces it in one stroke and exactly. A first-order relativistic wave equation forces a four-component spinor, from which spin s=½, the g-factor of 2, the spin-orbit term, and antiparticles all emerge automatically.

╌╌╌╌

The fine-structure formula required three separate perturbations, each of order , and a factor of from Thomas precession inserted by hand. The Dirac equation delivers the same spectrum in one calculation, exact to all orders in , and with every ad hoc ingredient replaced by something forced by the structure of the equation. Spin, the -factor of , the Thomas factor, and the spin-orbit coupling are not added; they are consequences of demanding a relativistic wave equation that is first order in time. This lesson states the equation, reads off what its four-component structure means, quotes the exact Coulomb spectrum, and expands it to recover the fine-structure formula and the degeneracy that experiment then breaks.

Why a first-order equation

The Schrödinger equation is first order in time but second order in space, an asymmetry incompatible with relativity, which treats time and space on equal footing. The obvious relativistic patch is to quantize directly, giving the Klein–Gordon equation

Being second order in time, it requires both and as initial data, and the natural conserved density is not positive-definite, so cannot be a single-particle probability amplitude in the Schrödinger sense. Dirac's demand was an equation first order in both time and space,

with and constant coefficients. Requiring that iterating reproduce forces the coefficients to satisfy

No numbers satisfy these anticommutation relations; the smallest objects that do are matrices. The wave function must therefore have four components. That single algebraic fact, forced by first-order relativistic covariance, is the origin of spin and antimatter.1

The four components

In the standard (Dirac) representation the four-component spinor splits into two two-component pieces,

with the large components and the small components. For a particle at rest, or in the non-relativistic limit, is smaller than by a factor of order : the coupled equations give

where are the Pauli matrices. The two components of are the spin-up and spin-down amplitudes of the electron; spin is built into the equation, not assumed. Substituting back into the equation for and keeping terms through order reproduces, in order:

This reduction, the Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation, is where the three fine-structure corrections come from as a package, with no factor inserted by hand.

The Dirac spinor has four components: two large (electron spin up and down) and two small, suppressed by v/c ~ Zα. In the non-relativistic limit the small pair is slaved to the large pair by σ·p/2mc.

The two other solutions, with the roles of large and small reversed, are negative-energy states. Dirac reinterpreted the unfilled negative-energy sea as antiparticles, predicting the positron before its 1932 discovery. For the atomic bound-state problem the negative-energy sector matters only as the source of the small components and the zitterbewegung behind the Darwin term.

The exact Coulomb spectrum

For a Coulomb potential the Dirac equation is solved exactly, in closed form, by separating angular and radial parts much as in the non-relativistic problem but with the spinor structure carried through. The bound states have energies23

The energy depends on and only, never on separately, and the dependence is exact in , not a truncated expansion. The quantity under the square root, , must stay positive: for this fails at , i.e. , and beyond it the point-nucleus Dirac equation has no real ground-state energy, the first sign that very heavy nuclei need finite-size and QED treatment.

The κ quantum number

The angular part of the Dirac–Coulomb solution is not labelled by but by a single integer that packages the orbital and total angular momenta together. It is defined by

so fixes while the sign selects which of appears in the large component. The exact energy depends on only through , which is why it depends on and not on the sign that distinguishes the two values, the exact statement of the -degeneracy. The large and small components carry orbital angular momenta differing by one unit, and , so the spinor mixes two parities' worth of orbital character; the pair is what a non-relativistic observer resolves into a single .

The radial problem reduces to two coupled first-order equations. Writing the large and small radial components as and , with the potential energy and the total energy (rest mass included),

whose normalizable solutions exist only at the quantized energies above. The structure parallels the non-relativistic radial equation, now a coupled pair rather than a single second-order equation, with playing the role played there.

Recovering the fine-structure formula

Expanding the exact energy in powers of shows how it contains the non-relativistic and fine-structure results as its first two terms. Write and expand the square root and the outer power:

Subtracting the rest energy isolates the binding energy:

The first term is the Bohr energy . The second reproduces the fine-structure formula built term by term in the previous lessons. The Dirac theory thus confirms the perturbative assembly and supplies all higher orders in for free.

The exact Dirac binding energy (solid) and its α²-truncated expansion (dashed) as functions of Zα; they agree at small Zα and diverge as Zα approaches ½, where the j=½ square root reaches zero.

The Dirac level structure and its degeneracy

Ordering the levels by and produces the same map as the fine-structure formula, now exact. Within each the levels group by , and each level holds all the values compatible with . For the level contains both () and (), exactly degenerate; () sits above.

The Dirac fine structure of n=1 and n=2. Levels are labelled by (n, j); those of equal n and j but different ℓ coincide, so 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ share a level.

The degeneracy structure is summarized compactly.

states (spectroscopic) valuesdegeneracy
each
each
each

The boundary with QED

The degeneracy is the sharpest testable prediction of the Dirac theory: two states of different orbital character, held at exactly the same energy by the -independence of the Dirac spectrum. The prediction is wrong. The 1947 Lamb–Retherford experiment found lying about MHz above , a splitting no single-particle relativistic wave equation can produce. Its origin is the interaction of the electron with the quantized electromagnetic field: self-energy, vacuum polarization, and the vacuum fluctuations that smear the electron's position, all treated in quantum electrodynamics. The same field theory produces the anomalous magnetic moment , correcting the Dirac value that the four-component structure gave exactly.

The n=2 level of hydrogen across three theories. Bohr and Schrödinger give one level; Dirac fine structure splits it into two, with 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ degenerate; QED (dashed) lifts 2S₁/₂ above 2P₁/₂ by the Lamb shift.

The Dirac equation is therefore the last word in single-particle atomic theory and the first place it visibly fails. It captures the fine structure exactly, predicts antimatter, and forces spin from covariance alone; the residual GHz gap it cannot close is the entry point to a field-theoretic description, where hydrogen becomes the most precisely calculated and measured system in physics. The next module takes up the QED corrections and hyperfine structure that live in that gap.

Footnotes

  1. Bransden & Joachain, Physics of Atoms and Molecules, 2nd ed., Ch. 15 — the Dirac equation, the anticommuting matrices forced by first-order covariance, four-component spinors, large and small components, and the negative-energy solutions reinterpreted as antiparticles. https://www.pearson.com/en-gb/subject-catalog/p/physics-of-atoms-and-molecules/P200000005386
  2. Bransden & Joachain, Physics of Atoms and Molecules, 2nd ed., §5.2–5.3 — the exact Dirac–Coulomb energy levels, their dependence on and alone, and the expansion reproducing the fine-structure formula and the degeneracy.
  3. Foot, Atomic Physics, Ch. 2 Appendix — the Dirac energy formula quoted for hydrogen, its reduction to the fine-structure formula at order , and the connection to the Lamb shift beyond it. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atomic-physics-9780198506959

╌╌ END ╌╌