The Quark Model/Meson Multiplets and Quantum Numbers

Lesson 4.21,002 words

Meson Multiplets and Quantum Numbers

Mesons as quark–antiquark bound states. The spin singlet and triplet, orbital excitations, and the assignment of J^PC from the quark spins and orbital angular momentum, giving the pseudoscalar and vector nonets.

╌╌╌╌

A meson is a bound state of a quark and an antiquark. The flavor content and the multiplet structure were fixed in the previous lesson; this one adds the spin and space degrees of freedom, which turn each flavor nonet into a tower of states labelled by their spin, parity, and charge conjugation. The labelling scheme, , is the language the Particle Data Group uses for every meson, and it follows entirely from the two quark spins and their relative orbital motion.1

Spin, parity, and charge conjugation

The two constituents each carry spin , so their spins combine into a total quark spin (anti-aligned, the singlet) or (aligned, the triplet). The pair also has an orbital angular momentum about their common center. The meson's total angular momentum is the vector sum

The two quark spins combine into total spin S = 0 (anti-aligned) or S = 1 (aligned); together with the orbital angular momentum L this fixes the meson spin J. The ground states have L = 0, giving J = 0 and J = 1.

Parity and charge conjugation are multiplicative quantum numbers built from the intrinsic parities of the constituents and the spatial and exchange properties of the wavefunction. A fermion and its antifermion carry opposite intrinsic parity, so the pair contributes a factor ; the orbital wavefunction contributes . The result is

Charge conjugation is defined only for the flavor-neutral mesons (those equal to their own antiparticle). Interchanging the quark and antiquark exchanges their positions, spins, and charges; collecting the factors gives

These two rules generate the whole meson spectrum from the allowed .

The two nonets share the geometry of the meson octet-plus-singlet: the same nine sites on the plane, one unit of spin apart.

The two ground-state nonets share one hexagonal weight pattern, labelled here by quark content. Anti-aligned quark spins give the spin-0 pseudoscalar nonet (J^PC = 0^-+); aligned spins give the spin-1 vector nonet (J^PC = 1^--). Only the spin differs; the flavor geometry is identical.

Orbital excitations

Raising builds heavier multiplets on the same flavor nonets. The rules above give their quantum numbers directly. For the parity is and the four -combinations produce

in spectroscopic notation . These are the , , , families near . Some combinations of that a pair cannot produce — , , , — are called exotic; a meson observed with such quantum numbers cannot be a simple quark and antiquark, a signature pursued in the final lesson.

Flavor mixing at the center

The three flavor-neutral pseudoscalars share and therefore mix, as noted in the previous lesson. The physical and are rotations of the octet state and singlet state by a pseudoscalar mixing angle ,

with to from the measured masses.2 The mixing is small, so the physical is nearly the octet state and nearly the singlet. That is anomalously heavy (, against for ) is a separate effect — the singlet is not a would-be Goldstone boson of chiral symmetry, and the axial anomaly lifts its mass — treated in the QCD module.3

Flavor mixing as a rotation. The octet (eta-8) and singlet (eta-1) basis states, degenerate in the symmetry limit, mix through the quark-mass and anomaly terms; the physical eta and eta-prime are the rotated eigenstates. For the vector nonet the analogous rotation is near-ideal, so phi is almost pure strange-antistrange.

For the vector nonet the mixing is near ideal: the physical is almost pure and the almost pure . The difference between the pseudoscalar and vector cases is a competition between the symmetry, which favors the octet/singlet combinations, and the strange-quark mass, which favors the pure states; the symmetry wins for the light pseudoscalars, the mass for the heavier vectors.4

Heavy quarkonia

A bound state of a heavy quark and its antiquark — charm (charmonium) or bottom (bottomonium) — is the closest thing in the strong interaction to a hydrogen atom. The large quark mass makes the constituents move slowly, so the states are approximately non-relativistic and organize into a discrete level spectrum labelled by radial and orbital quantum numbers, in direct analogy to positronium. The heavy mass also sets the size below the confinement scale, where the potential is Coulomb-like from single-gluon exchange plus a linear confining term,

the Cornell potential.5 The short-distance Coulomb piece produces the hydrogen-like level ordering; the linear piece pushes the higher levels up and eventually confines.

The charmonium (c-cbar) spectrum, a positronium-like ladder. Levels are labelled by spectroscopic term n^(2S+1)L_J and mass in MeV. The 1S states are the pseudoscalar eta_c (spin 0) and the vector J/psi (spin 1); the 1P triplet is the chi_c states; the 2S vector is the psi-prime. The dashed line marks the open-charm threshold above which decay to two D mesons opens.

The charmonium levels are the classic case. The states are the pseudoscalar (, ) and the vector (, ); the discovery of the sharp resonance in 1974 established the charm quark. The states are the triplet () near , and the vector is the ().6 All sit below the open-charm threshold at ; above it, a state can fall apart into two mesons and the levels broaden sharply. Bottomonium repeats the pattern at higher mass — the vector at heads a similar ladder — with the levels more nearly Coulombic because the heavier quark probes shorter distances. These spectra are the strongest evidence that the quark model describes real dynamical bound states, not merely a labelling of the light hadrons.

Lifetimes and widths

The wide range of meson lifetimes reflects which interaction drives the decay. A meson that can decay through the strong force does so in ; these are the resonances, seen as broad bumps in a cross section, such as the (). Mesons for which the strong channel is closed decay electromagnetically (, ) or weakly (, ), and are correspondingly narrow. The conversion between a width and a lifetime is the uncertainty relation , with , so a width corresponds to .7 The spread — fourteen orders of magnitude across the meson tables — is not a property of the quark content but of the strongest interaction the particular decay can use.

Footnotes

  1. Griffiths, Introduction to Elementary Particles, §5.5–5.6, derives the assignments for mesons and lists the pseudoscalar and vector nonets. Quantum numbers and masses follow the Particle Data Group, pdg.lbl.gov.
  2. Griffiths, §5.6, and Thomson, §9.4, give the mixing angle; the value depends on whether a linear or quadratic mass formula is used. Masses from the Particle Data Group, pdg.lbl.gov.
  3. Tong, The Standard Model (Cambridge Part III), §3.3.1, identifies the octet pseudoscalars as pseudo-Goldstone bosons and attributes the anomalously large mass to the axial anomaly.
  4. Tong, §3.3.1, contrasts the pseudoscalar and vector nonets: the pseudoscalars are dominated by (octet/singlet content), the vectors by the strange-quark mass (near-ideal , ).
  5. Griffiths, §5.3, motivates the quark–antiquark potential with a short-range Coulomb term from one-gluon exchange and a linear confining term; the color factor is derived in the QCD module.
  6. Griffiths, §5.6, treats charmonium as heavy-quark positronium; masses and from the Particle Data Group, pdg.lbl.gov.
  7. Tong, §3.3.2, tabulates meson lifetimes and gives the width–time rule of thumb () and the characteristic time scales of the strong, electromagnetic, and weak decays.

╌╌ END ╌╌