The W and Z Bosons
The contact theory hides a massive mediator. The charged carries the current that changes flavour; the neutral carries a current that does not.
╌╌╌╌
The previous lesson ended with a mediator whose mass, hidden in the denominator of its propagator, is the real reason the weak interaction looks feeble at low energy. This lesson gives that mediator flesh. The charged-current and the neutral-current are the massive gauge bosons of the electroweak theory; their masses were predicted before they were seen, their 1983 discovery at CERN confirmed the framework, and their decays — especially the 's invisible width — measure some of the sharpest numbers in the Standard Model, including the count of light neutrino generations. We work at energies comparable to the boson masses, where the full propagator, not the contact approximation, is in play.
Charged and neutral currents
The electroweak interaction has two kinds of current. The charged current, carried by the , changes a fermion into its doublet partner and so changes electric charge by one unit: an electron becomes a neutrino, an up quark becomes a down quark. The neutral current, carried by the , couples a fermion to itself without changing its identity — like the photon, but reaching neutrinos and with a chirality-dependent strength. Reading off the electroweak Lagrangian in terms of the physical fields, the couplings organize as
where is the Weinberg angle mixing the and hypercharge fields into the and the photon, and is the electric charge.1 The charged current is purely left-chiral — the structure of the previous lesson — while the neutral current carries both a left-chiral piece and a piece proportional to the electromagnetic current, so its coupling to each fermion depends on the fermion's weak isospin and charge through .
Masses and the discovery at the SppS
The electroweak theory ties the boson masses to the Higgs vacuum expectation value , the gauge couplings, and the Weinberg angle:
so the theory predicts and fixes their ratio by alone. The measured values are
consistent with .2 These are enormous masses for elementary particles — the weighs as much as a rubidium atom — and producing them required a dedicated machine. In 1983 the UA1 and UA2 experiments at CERN's Super Proton–Antiproton Synchrotron () collided protons and antiprotons at GeV, and Carlo Rubbia's team identified the through its leptonic decay — a high-energy electron recoiling against missing momentum carried off by the unseen neutrino — and the through the cleaner and , a sharp pair of opposite leptons peaking at the mass. The discovery, at the masses the theory demanded, earned Rubbia and van der Meer the 1984 Nobel Prize.3
Decay widths and branching ratios
A heavy gauge boson is unstable: it decays to every fermion–antifermion pair light enough to be produced. The total widths are large,
corresponding to lifetimes of order s.4 The decays either to a charged lepton and its neutrino or to a quark pair; each of the three lepton channels takes about , and the quark channels together about , enhanced by the three colours available to each quark pair. The partitions similarly but includes a channel the cannot have — decay to a neutrino pair , which escapes every detector:
The colour factor of three is directly visible here: the hadronic width is enhanced over a single leptonic channel by roughly the number of accessible quark flavours times three colours, and measuring the ratio is one confirmation that quarks come in three colours.
The invisible width and three generations
The invisible width is the 's most consequential number. Each light neutrino species — one that the can decay into, meaning — adds one identical partial width to the total. The measured invisible width, divided by the theoretical width per neutrino, counts the number of light generations:
The result is three, to better than one percent.5 This is measured at LEP not by catching the invisible decays but by their effect on the visible resonance: the total width sets both the height and the breadth of the peak in . A fourth light neutrino would widen the resonance and lower its peak by adding an unseen decay path. The data sit squarely on the three-neutrino curve, excluding a fourth generation with a light neutrino. This is among the most economical profound measurements in physics: the number of matter generations, read from the shape of a single resonance.
Beta decay at the parton level
With the in hand, the oldest weak process becomes transparent. Nuclear beta decay is, at the level of quarks, a single down quark inside a neutron emitting a and turning into an up quark:
so the neutron () becomes a proton () while the materializes the electron and antineutrino. The neutron lifetime is about s — ten minutes, extraordinarily long for a decay, precisely because the tiny energy release MeV sits so far below that the process is doubly suppressed: by the small phase space and by the propagator factor. The same diagram with a muon in place of the electron is muon decay; the same diagram at the hadron level, with the spectator quarks drawn in, is beta decay. One vertex structure, dressed differently, runs the entire zoo of weak decays.6
Summary
The weak interaction is carried by two massive gauge bosons: the charged , which changes a fermion into its doublet partner, and the neutral , which does not. Their masses GeV and GeV obey and were confirmed by the 1983 discovery. Their large widths partition into leptonic and colour-enhanced hadronic channels; the additionally decays invisibly to neutrinos, and the invisible width measures , fixing three light generations. Beta decay, muon decay, and every heavy-flavour decay are one -exchange diagram in different costumes. What we have not yet explained is why the couples up quarks not only to down quarks but, more weakly, to strange and bottom — the quark mixing that the next lesson organizes into the CKM matrix.
Footnotes
- Tong, The Standard Model (Cambridge Part III), §5.3.1 — the electroweak currents, the /photon couplings written via the Weinberg angle, and the chiral structure of the neutral current. damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/standardmodel.html ↩
- Boson masses , and : Particle Data Group, Review of Particle Physics, gauge-boson listings, pdg.lbl.gov. The mass relation is derived in Tong §5.2. ↩
- Thomson, Modern Particle Physics, Ch. 16 — the UA1/UA2 discovery of the and at the ; original reports UA1 (Arnison et al.) and UA2 (Banner et al.), Phys. Lett. B (1983). ↩
- Total and partial widths , and the branching fractions: Particle Data Group, pdg.lbl.gov. ↩
- The invisible-width determination from the combined LEP line-shape measurements is reported by the Particle Data Group, pdg.lbl.gov; see also Thomson, Ch. 16. ↩
- Tong, The Standard Model (Cambridge Part III), §5.3.3 — beta decay as with the neutron () becoming a proton (), and the common vertex structure of beta, muon, and heavy-flavour decays. The neutron lifetime value follows the Particle Data Group, pdg.lbl.gov. ↩
╌╌ END ╌╌