The Logarithm, Exponential, and Improper Integrals
The integral defines transcendental functions. The logarithm is the area under 1/t, the exponential is its inverse, and their calculus properties follow from the fundamental theorem.
╌╌╌╌
The fundamental theorem guarantees that every continuous function has an antiderivative, even when no elementary formula exists. This makes the integral a tool for defining functions. The logarithm and exponential, taken for granted in calculus, are built here from the integral of . Improper integrals then push integration past its original setting — bounded functions on bounded intervals — to unbounded domains and unbounded integrands.
The logarithm as an integral
Define a function by the area under the hyperbola , starting at .
Its defining properties come straight from the integral.1
- Base point and derivative. , and by the differentiation form is differentiable with .
- Monotone bijection. Since , is strictly increasing, hence injective, and is onto with and .
- Functional equation. , proved by the substitution in the defining integral.
- Powers. for rational .
Surjectivity uses that , so ; the Archimedean property and the intermediate value theorem then hit every real value.1 Uniqueness is a corollary of the evaluation form: any function with and must equal .
The exponential as the inverse
Because is a strictly monotone differentiable bijection, it has a differentiable inverse.
The inverse-function rule turns into the defining differential equation of the exponential.1
The two functions are mirror images across the diagonal, with reciprocal slopes at corresponding points — a slope for at becomes a slope for at .
With in hand, irrational powers can be defined: for set , extending the rational-exponent rules by continuity, and since .1 The general power and exponential laws follow by differentiating the composition:
the first fixing and varying , the second fixing the base . The classical limit definition of the exponential is recovered from the logarithm: since has derivative at ,
the continuous-compounding limit, obtained by taking logarithms and using .1
Improper integrals
The Riemann integral is defined only for bounded functions on bounded intervals. Two extensions, each a limit of proper integrals, cover unbounded domains and unbounded integrands.
The prototype family sets the convergence threshold. The exponent determines whether the tail area is finite.2
At infinity the integrand must decay faster than ; near the singularity must be milder than .
| Integral | Converges when | Diverges when | Value on convergence |
|---|---|---|---|
The comparison test
Convergence of a hard integral often follows from a simpler dominating one, just as for series.
Splitting an improper integral before establishing convergence is invalid: converges, but rewriting it as produces , since each piece diverges.2
Absolute versus conditional convergence
An improper integral can converge through cancellation without converging absolutely — the continuous analogue of a conditionally convergent series.
The alternating signs of provide the same cancellation as in the alternating harmonic series.
The integral test for series
A decreasing nonnegative function ties the convergence of a series to the convergence of an integral, because its terms and its area sandwich each other.
The estimate is quantitative, not just qualitative: it brackets a sum to within .
The same test recovers the -series result — converges exactly when does, i.e. for .
| Object | Convergence tool | Threshold example |
|---|---|---|
| -test | converges iff | |
| , | comparison test | dominated by convergent |
| parts + comparison | conditional, not absolute | |
| , | integral test | matches |
Footnotes
- Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §5.4 — the logarithm as with its five characterizing properties (Prop. 5.4.1), the exponential as its inverse with (Prop. 5.4.2), and the definition . ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
- Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §5.5 — improper integrals (Def. 5.5.1), the -test (Prop. 5.5.2), the comparison test (Prop. 5.5.5) with the and examples, and the integral test with the estimate (Prop. 5.5.13, Example 5.5.14). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
- Shkoller, MAT125B Lecture Notes, §1.12 — improper integrals, absolute versus conditional convergence (Def. 1.45), and the proof that is conditionally but not absolutely convergent (Example 1.47). ↩ ↩2
╌╌ END ╌╌