The integral is a linear, order-preserving, additive operator on the integrable functions. It splits across subintervals, respects inequalities, bounds the size of a function by the integral of its absolute value, and preserves products.
╌╌╌╌
The integral behaves like a sum: it adds across pieces of the
domain, scales and adds across functions, and preserves order. Each property is
inherited from the corresponding fact about the Darboux sums that define it, and
together they turn ∫ab into a linear operator on the space
R[a,b] of integrable functions.
Additivity over subintervals
Cutting the domain at an interior point splits the integral into two, and
subdividing at a point does not affect integrability.
Additivity: the area over [a,c] is the area over [a,b] plus the area over [b,c]. Cutting at the interior point b neither creates nor destroys integrability.
Two conventions extend the formula to any ordering of the limits, so additivity
holds for arbitrary α,β,γ∈[a,b]:1
b∫af:=−a∫bf,a∫af:=0,α∫γf=α∫βf+β∫γf.
Linearity
The integral is linear: it commutes with scaling and with addition. On a fixed
partition the Darboux sums already scale and split, and the operations are
preserved in the passage to sup and inf.
Order and monotonicity
Larger integrands give larger integrals. On each subinterval f≤g forces
mi(f)≤mi(g), so the lower sums compare, and the ordering is preserved by
the supremum.
Two consequences are used constantly. Taking g≡M recovers the crude bound
∫abf≤M(b−a); taking f≡m gives the lower bound. And applied to
a nonnegative integrand, monotonicity says ∫abf≥0 whenever f≥0.
Monotonicity of the integral. With f≤g pointwise, the region under f sits inside the region under g, so ∫f≤∫g; the shaded band between the graphs is the nonnegative difference.
The integral triangle inequality
The size of an integral is controlled by the integral of the size. First, taking
absolute values preserves integrability, because the oscillation of ∣f∣ never
exceeds that of f.
Geometrically, ∫abf is a signed area — lobes below the axis subtract —
while ∫ab∣f∣ folds those lobes up and adds them, so cancellation can only
shrink the magnitude.
Signed versus unsigned area. On the left ∫f counts the lower lobe negatively, so magnitudes cancel; on the right ∣f∣ reflects that lobe above the axis and everything adds, giving the larger value.
Products and the algebra of integrable functions
The integrable functions are closed under multiplication, not only addition, a
fact used whenever an integrand is a product.
Closure under products gives the integral form of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality,
proved exactly as in a finite sum.
The mean value theorem for integrals
A continuous function attains, somewhere on the interval, exactly its average
value. Equivalently, the integral equals a rectangle whose height is a genuine
function value.
The integral mean value theorem: the shaded area under f equals the area of a rectangle of the same width whose height f(c) is an attained value — the average height of f over [a,b].
Two refinements matter. The first is a strict-positivity statement.
The second
refinement is a weighted mean value theorem: for continuous f and nonnegative
integrable w, some c∈[a,b] gives ∫abfw=f(c)∫abw, since the
average of f weighted by w still lies between minf and maxf.
Invariance under finite edits
Integration ignores what happens at finitely many points.
This is why the value of an integrand at a jump (such as the 21 at the
discontinuity of a step function) never affects its integral.
Property
Statement
Source of the proof
Additivity
∫acf=∫abf+∫bcf
partitions split at b
Linearity
∫(αf+βg)=α∫f+β∫g
sums scale and add
Monotonicity
f≤g⇒∫f≤∫g
mi(f)≤mi(g)
Triangle
∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣
−∣f∣≤f≤∣f∣
Products
fg∈R[a,b]
polarization of squares
Mean value
∫abf=f(c)(b−a)
bounds plus IVT
Footnotes
Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §5.2 — additivity (Lemma 5.2.1, Prop. 5.2.2), linearity (Prop. 5.2.4), monotonicity (Prop. 5.2.6), and invariance under changing finitely many values (Prop. 5.2.10), together with the ∫ba=−∫ab conventions. ↩↩2↩3↩4↩5
Shkoller, MAT125B Lecture Notes, §1.8 — linearity of the Riemann integral (Thm. 1.22), reduced to the linearity Sδ(f+g)=Sδ(f)+Sδ(g) of Riemann sums. ↩
Shkoller, MAT125B Lecture Notes, §1.9 — integrability of ∣f∣ and the bound ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣ (Thm. 1.30), via Uδ(∣f∣)−Lδ(∣f∣)≤Uδ(f)−Lδ(f). ↩
Shkoller, MAT125B Lecture Notes, §1.13 (Problems 1.2–1.3) — f∈R(a,b)⇒f2∈R(a,b) and the polarization identity (f−g)2−(f+g)2=−4fg giving fg∈R(a,b). ↩
Shkoller, MAT125B Lecture Notes, §1.9 — the intermediate value (mean value) theorem for integrals (Thm. 1.28): a continuous f attains its average value; cf. Lebl §5.2 Exercise 5.2.4. ↩