Indeterminate Forms and l'Hospital's Rule
When a limit produces 0/0 or infinity over infinity, the value is undetermined by the forms alone. l'Hospital's Rule resolves both by replacing the ratio of functions with the ratio of their derivatives.
╌╌╌╌
Consider . Both numerator and denominator approach , and is not a number, so the limit laws for quotients do not apply: the value is not determined by the form. It might be any number, or fail to exist. The same ambiguity arises for , where numerator and denominator both grow without bound. l'Hospital's Rule handles both cases by replacing the ratio of two functions with the ratio of their derivatives, and applied repeatedly it ranks the competing growth rates of logarithms, powers, and exponentials.
Indeterminate forms
Some such limits yield to algebra. A rational cancels a common factor,
and was found by a geometric argument. But has no factor to cancel, and a general method is needed.
l'Hospital's Rule
The statement holds for one-sided limits and for ; the symbol may be replaced by , , , or . Named for the Marquis de l'Hospital, who published it in 1696, the rule was discovered by John Bernoulli.
The reason is visible when with continuous and . Near each function is close to its tangent line through , so the ratio of the functions is close to the ratio of the two linear approximations, which is the ratio of their slopes.
Formally, using the definition of the derivative,
where the middle step uses . The general proof, valid without continuity of the derivatives and for the case, is more delicate but gives the same conclusion.
The differentiation is of numerator and denominator separately; this is not the quotient rule. Returning to the opening example,
Comparing growth rates
Repeated application compares the growth rates of the function families of this module. For , type , two passes clear the denominator:
The exponential outgrows the power; in fact grows faster than every power . At the other extreme the logarithm grows slower than every positive power:
These two results give the ordering that governs limits at infinity: logarithms grow slower than powers, and powers grow slower than exponentials.
A harder example needs three applications:
Checking the form
l'Hospital's Rule applies only to and . Applying it blindly to a ratio that is not indeterminate gives a wrong answer. For , the numerator tends to but the denominator tends to , so the form is , not indeterminate, and the function is continuous there:
Differentiating top and bottom would have produced , which is incorrect. Verify the form before differentiating, and prefer simpler methods when they apply.
A second failure mode is a genuine indeterminate form on which the rule cycles without ever simplifying. There the derivatives only reshuffle the same expression, and elementary algebra settles the limit at once.
Reducing other forms to a quotient
Products, differences, and powers can each be indeterminate, and each is handled by algebra that recasts it as or .
| Form | Situation | Conversion |
|---|---|---|
| , | write or | |
| , | common denominator, factor, or rationalize | |
| take : , type |
Indeterminate products
For type , move one factor into the denominator.
Indeterminate differences
For type , combine into a single fraction.
Indeterminate powers
Three forms arise from : type when and ; type when and ; and type when and . All three are resolved by taking the logarithm, which turns the power into the product .
For , type , set , so
a form. l'Hospital gives
and since , the original limit is . The exponentiation at the end is essential: the rule computes , and the answer is raised to that.
The canonical form is the limit that defines .
The type is handled identically. For , set , so , a form. l'Hospital gives
The vanishing exponent cancels the growing base, leaving .
Proof of the rule
The special case with and continuous derivatives was proved above by splitting the ratio into two difference quotients. The general statement, which allows one-sided approach and the form, rests on a two-function version of the Mean Value Theorem.
Taking recovers the ordinary Mean Value Theorem. Applied to the pair on a shrinking interval with endpoint , and using , the equation rearranges to
for some between and . As the intermediate point is squeezed to as well, so the ratio approaches , which is the conclusion of the rule.
╌╌ END ╌╌