The Oscillator Algebraically, and Symmetry/Coherent and Squeezed States

Lesson 5.2832 words

Coherent and Squeezed States

A single number state never moves — its position expectation is pinned at the origin. The superposition that oscillates like a classical particle is the eigenstate of the annihilation operator: the coherent state.

╌╌╌╌

The number states diagonalize the Hamiltonian but look nothing like a classical oscillator. Each has for all time, a probability cloud frozen in place. A pendulum, by contrast, has a definite position that swings sinusoidally. The quantum states that reproduce that behavior as closely as the uncertainty principle allows are the coherent states, and they are singled out by one clean condition: they are eigenstates of the annihilation operator.1

Eigenstates of the annihilation operator

Ask for a state obeying

The eigenvalue is complex because is not Hermitian. The raising operator has no such eigenstates — pushes probability up the ladder without bound, and no normalizable superposition survives — but the lowering operator does, because it terminates on the vacuum. Expand and impose the eigenvalue condition. Using ,

Matching the coefficient of gives the recursion , so

Normalization fixes . Since ,

Poissonian photon statistics

The probability of finding quanta in a coherent state is , which reads off the expansion:

This is a Poisson distribution with mean . The mean and variance of a Poisson law are equal, so

The fractional spread in photon number shrinks as the field grows, so a bright coherent beam has a nearly definite intensity even though the number is not sharp. The photon-counting fluctuations are the shot noise of an ideal laser, whose output is very close to a coherent state.2

The photon-number distribution of a coherent state is Poissonian, with . The peak sits near and the width scales as , so larger fields are relatively sharper in intensity.

The displacement operator

The coherent state has a compact operator description. Define the displacement operator

which is unitary because its exponent is anti-Hermitian. Its exponent splits by the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff identity: with and , the commutator is a number, so

Acting on the vacuum, because , while . The two combine into exactly the coherent-state expansion:

A coherent state is a displaced vacuum. The name is literal: conjugating the ladder operators shows the displacement shifts phase space by ,

The displacement operator slides the vacuum Gaussian rigidly to the point in phase space without changing its shape or width. The coherent state is this displaced vacuum.

Minimum uncertainty and classical motion

Because a coherent state is the vacuum shifted rigidly, its widths equal the vacuum's. From and its adjoint,

and a short calculation with , gives the widths

Every coherent state saturates the uncertainty bound, and the widths are independent of : the wave packet keeps the shape of the ground-state Gaussian while its center sits anywhere in phase space. The vacuum is the special case centered at the origin.

The center then moves classically. In the Heisenberg picture, so the eigenvalue rotates, , and

The expectation traces a sinusoid at the classical frequency with amplitude set by . Equivalently, under time evolution a coherent state stays coherent, : the Gaussian blob keeps its shape and orbits the phase-space origin on a circle of radius , the closest a quantum state comes to a point particle on a classical trajectory.

A coherent state is a rigid minimum-uncertainty Gaussian whose center orbits the phase-space origin at the classical frequency; its projection onto the axis is the sinusoid .

Squeezed states

A coherent state divides its uncertainty equally between two directions in phase space. Nothing forces that split. Define the dimensionless quadrature operators

the amplitudes of the and parts of the motion. Their commutator enforces . The vacuum and every coherent state are isotropic: , a circle of uncertainty. A squeezed state keeps the product at the floor but makes the ellipse eccentric,

with the squeeze parameter. It is generated by the squeeze operator

whose quadratic exponent conjugates into a mixture of and , stretching one quadrature and compressing the orthogonal one.

The coherent state's isotropic uncertainty circle (left) becomes an ellipse under squeezing (right): one quadrature drops below the vacuum noise while the conjugate grows, the area unchanged.

Squeezing has a direct experimental payoff. An interferometer limited by the shot noise of coherent light can beat that limit by injecting squeezed light into its dark port, aligning the reduced quadrature with the measured phase. Gravitational-wave detectors run this way, reading out a strain smaller than the vacuum fluctuations of ordinary laser light would permit.3 The three regimes of photon statistics label where a state's number fluctuations sit relative to the coherent benchmark.

State vs. StatisticsPhysical example
Number state sub-Poissoniansingle-photon source
Coherent Poissonianideal laser
Thermalsuper-Poissonianblackbody / chaotic light
Three photon-number distributions at the same mean : the number state is a single spike (sub-Poissonian), the coherent state is the Poisson envelope (variance equal to the mean), and thermal light decays monotonically (super-Poissonian, widest).

The coherent state is the boundary case: the most classical pure state of the field, and the reference against which quantum-enhanced measurement is defined.

Footnotes

  1. Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu & Laloë, Quantum Mechanics Vol. I (Wiley, 1977), Complement — quasi-classical (coherent) states: the eigenvalue condition , the number-state expansion, minimum uncertainty, and classical-limit oscillation. Original construction: R. J. Glauber, Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963), https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766; and E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 14, 664 (1926).
  2. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed., Springer, 1994), Ch. 7 problems and Ch. 21 — coherent states as minimum-uncertainty wave packets tracking the classical trajectory; https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-0576-8. Poissonian counting statistics and shot noise: Sakurai & Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics (3rd ed., Cambridge, 2021), §2.3.
  3. Squeezed light below the vacuum limit and its use in precision interferometry: the LIGO Collaboration, A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nature Physics 7, 962 (2011), https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys2083. Formal treatment of the squeeze operator and quadrature variances: Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu & Laloë, Vol. I, Complement .

╌╌ END ╌╌