Wave Mechanics in One Dimension/Particle in Infinite and Finite Square Wells

Lesson 3.31,230 words

Particle in Infinite and Finite Square Wells

The infinite square well is the simplest bound-state problem: two boundary conditions quantize the energy into a ladder E_n = n² E_1, and the eigenfunctions are the standing waves of a string fixed at both ends. Relaxing the walls to a finite depth lets the wave function leak into the classically forbidden region, keeps the number of bound states finite, and turns the eigenvalue condition into a transcendental equation solved graphically.

╌╌╌╌

The time-independent Schrödinger equation becomes a solvable ordinary differential equation once a potential is fixed. The most transparent case is a particle confined to a box with perfectly rigid walls, the infinite square well. It admits exact solutions with no difficult mathematics, reproduces the standing-wave quantization of a string fixed at both ends, and displays every qualitative feature of a bound quantum system.1

The infinite square well

A particle is free inside a region of width and cannot escape it:

A macroscopic image is a bead sliding on a frictionless wire between two massive stops; a physical realization is an electron between charged grids whose repelling fields become the walls as the voltage is raised. Because the potential is infinite outside, the wave function must vanish there — the particle is certainly inside — and by continuity must reach zero at each wall:

Quantization from standing waves

Inside the well , so the equation is the free-particle equation

with general solution . The wall at forces ; since , the cosine term must drop, . The wall at then requires

which holds only when is an integer multiple of :

Written through , this is : an integer number of half-wavelengths fits the well, exactly the standing-wave condition for a string of length clamped at both ends. The value gives , no particle, and is excluded.

The energy follows from with :

The integer is a quantum number: it fixes both the energy and the wave function.

Energy levels of the infinite well rise as n squared inside rigid walls; a classical particle could sit at any height, but only the marked levels solve the wave equation.

The eigenfunctions

With and the wave functions are sines. The constant is fixed by normalization; since outside, only the interval contributes:

The lowest state is the ground state; are excited states. Every has the same peak amplitude , and every probability density peaks at .

The first three eigenfunctions are half, full, and one-and-a-half sine waves pinned to zero at both walls; each higher state adds one interior node.

The zero-point energy is not an accident of the algebra. A particle pinned exactly at rest would have definite position and definite (zero) momentum, forbidden by the uncertainty principle. Confining the particle to width forces a momentum spread and thus a minimum kinetic energy of order — the same size as .

Classical correspondence

Classically a particle in the box moves at constant speed, reflecting off each wall, and is equally likely to be found anywhere: the position distribution is flat, . The quantum ground state looks nothing like this — it is a single hump peaked at the center with zero probability at the walls. The two pictures reconcile at large . In state the density has peaks, and averaged over a small window containing several oscillations , so

This is Bohr's correspondence principle: the quantum distribution reproduces the classical one when is large. A measurement with finite resolution cannot resolve the individual peaks and returns the classical average.2

At n equals 10 the probability density has ten peaks; smeared over a detector's resolution it flattens to the constant classical distribution shown dashed.

A worked spectrum. Take , about the size of an atom. Writing with and ,

comparable to the binding of hydrogen. The higher levels are and . Photons emitted in downward transitions carry the level differences:

Transition

These are soft-X-ray wavelengths, the scale expected when an electron is confined to atomic dimensions.3

The finite square well

Real wells have finite depth. Lowering the walls to a height ,

changes the boundary behavior. For a bound state, . Inside the well and the equation is again with , so oscillates. Outside the well , and the equation becomes

The exterior solution is a real exponential , decaying into the barrier. The wave function no longer vanishes at the wall; instead and must join continuously to the interior sine, and the exterior tail must go to zero at infinity.

Origin of energy quantization

The curvature rule does the selecting. Inside, and have opposite signs, so curves toward the axis and oscillates. Outside, they share a sign, so curves away from the axis. For a generic energy, the exterior solution that matches the interior at the wall curves away and diverges to — not normalizable, not physical. Only for special energies does the interior emerge at the wall with exactly the slope that lets the exterior decay to zero. Those energies are the bound-state levels.

Slightly off the allowed energy the exterior solution curls away to plus or minus infinity; at the exact eigenvalue the function and its slope reach zero together, giving the one normalizable tail.

The finite well differs from the infinite well in three ways.4

  • Penetration. is nonzero in the regions and , where classically and the kinetic energy would be negative. There is a real probability of finding the particle in the classically forbidden region, falling off as .
  • Fewer, lower levels. Because the wave function extends into the walls, its half-wavelength inside is slightly longer than in the infinite well, so each energy is somewhat lower than the corresponding infinite-well level. Only a finite number of bound states exist, set by the depth ; a very shallow well holds just one.
  • Guaranteed ground state. However shallow, a one-dimensional well always binds at least one state.

The penetration does not let a measurement return a negative kinetic energy. Localizing the particle in the tail region, of extent , injects a momentum uncertainty and a minimum kinetic energy , exactly enough to forbid the measurement of a negative value. The same tail is the seed of barrier tunneling.

In the finite well the eigenfunctions do not vanish at the walls; they decay exponentially into the barriers, so the probability density has tails in the classically forbidden region.

The graphical eigenvalue condition

For most finite potentials the matching conditions produce a transcendental equation with no closed-form solution, but a symmetric well admits a clean graphical reading. Center the well on the origin with half-width , so it runs from to . The symmetric potential splits the solutions by parity: the interior is either a cosine (even) or a sine (odd). Matching and at gives

Introduce the dimensionless variables and . Their squares sum to a constant fixed by the well:

because . The allowed states are the intersections of this circle of radius with the curves (even) and (odd) in the first quadrant. Each intersection is one bound state.

Bound states of the symmetric finite well are the intersections of the quarter circle of radius R0 with the tangent and cotangent branches; a deeper well has a larger radius and catches more intersections.

Reading off the geometry: a small radius meets only the first even branch, so a shallow well holds exactly one (even, nodeless) ground state. As grows, increases and the circle sweeps across successive branches, adding an odd state, then another even state, and so on. The number of bound states is the number of half- intervals the radius spans,

always at least one.5 The same qualitative analysis applies to any well-type potential: wherever the wave function oscillates, wherever it curves away, and only discrete energies give a solution that decays at infinity. The harmonic oscillator is the next such potential.

Footnotes

  1. Tipler & Llewellyn, Modern Physics, §6-2 — the infinite square well: setup, boundary conditions, standing-wave quantization, eigenfunctions , and quantum numbers.
  2. Tipler & Llewellyn, Modern Physics, §6-2 — comparison with the classical flat distribution and the correspondence principle at large (Figure 6-5, ).
  3. Tipler & Llewellyn, Modern Physics, §6-2, Example 6-4 — ground-state energy and transition wavelengths for an electron in a box.
  4. Tipler & Llewellyn, Modern Physics, §6-3 — the finite square well: penetration into the classically forbidden region, finitely many bound states, energies lower than the infinite well, and the uncertainty-principle resolution of the negative-kinetic-energy puzzle.
  5. Tipler & Llewellyn, Modern Physics, §6-3, Graphical Solution of the Finite Square Well — the transcendental matching conditions and their graphical solution as circle-versus-tangent intersections.

╌╌ END ╌╌